(not Postmodernism, nor even, mercifully, Post-postmodernism!). But, it
 is not our agenda here to set distinctions between these different 
labels. Suffice it to say that as suggested by curator Fatima Lasay, the label New Modernism applies here in the sense that these pres
ent artists who work with computers seek to retrace their steps backward to the time in the 1960's whe
n
 software programs in video and audio were still in their infancy, thus 
requiring software developers to invent or create their own programs, 
and well before Bill Gates could impose a universal platform and 
commandeer all existing programs. While such an effort as theirs may 
somewhat appear to be on retrogressive, it however, makes a choice of 
greater latitude of inventiveness and originality in the use of a 
computer language that is not constrained by ready-made commercial 
programs or geared to set directions. This is not to say, however, that 
they have dispensed or can dispense with existing software altogether;
 the artist as programmer still works within a wide range of digital 
possibilities at the same time that he is able to manipulate them or 
install new commands to hew close to the original artistic intention.The title of the show DECODE is thus open to a number of meanings. The basic premise is to make a juxtaposition between a modernist painting in the Ateneo Art Gallery collection and a new media work. The contemporary artist "decodes" the earlier work through a kind of digital analysis of it's components of color, light texture, etc., and reorganizes these into a new artistic existence. This is seen, for instance, in the relationship between Joya's Granadean Arabesque and Martin Gomez's D\ILAW, in which the elements are recomposed into grids of perpetually moving fragments, thus revealing the inner dynamics of the original abstract work.
But even more crucial is the difference in the very nature of existence of the juxtaposed works. Painting, of course, is a physically spatial art, spanning over predetermined two-dimensional surface. And sculpture is a three-dimensional art that occupies a relatively va
riable
 space. But these examples of new art redefine both space and time in 
the context of art. They occupy a different space because they belong to
 virtual reality--as it has been pointed out, a glitch in the power 
system would shut them out of existence, temporarily or even 
permanently. Thus, they are beguiling presences or seductive 
experiences, inviting interactivity or the part of the viewer: you reach
 out to the moving forms and they respond by cradling your hand or 
flying out of your grasp. But, at an external signal, they can so easily
 withdraw back to silences and darkness. They are the interweaving, 
surrounding presences, whispering or blaring simulacra that tease one's 
perception and put to question one's sense of reality. Likewise, they 
also redefine art, for while painting may bear allusions to time and its
 passage, these present examples run in actual time, may follow a linear
 narrative but more often are cyclical, multifocal and may continue ad infinitum. However, this sense of virtuality--of
 virtual volume, for instance--had been introduced earlier by the 
Russian Constructivist who rejected solid volume for virtual volume in 
their work's active engagement with space. And this principle was not valorized
 in a purely formalistic way but as a necessary element in the creation 
of a new visual language that sought to do justice to a modern 
technological environment.New art technologies are stunningly displayed in the present show. Here, for instance is the printmaker Rodolfo Samonte juxtaposing his past and present work: Experimental Cube (1973) and Spheres of Time #2, a print
 (artist proof) that he did last year in the United States where he has 
been based for several years now. This work, visually engaging in terms 
of form and color, is an example of the digital technique of Giclee on canvas (white co
tton
 duck). Though the 1973 work is much subdued in hue and controlled in 
form but with a satisfying clarity of disposition, one will hesitate to 
declare the new superior to the old, for the artist was but working then
 according to the modernist printmaking codes at that time. If the codes
 he uses in the new work are far different, he is only proving his 
excellence in his employment of the new digital language.

No comments:
Post a Comment